Nonaggressionism and What it Means

, , ,

4 Responses to Nonaggressionism and What it Means

  1. Kiska Zilla May 7, 2011 at 11:29 pm #

    I really like the links you added to go along with what you were saying! Great job!! :D

    • Clayton Gee May 10, 2011 at 10:39 pm #

      Thank you Kiska.

  2. Ben May 10, 2011 at 6:26 pm #

    In a struggle between the strong and the weak, neutrality favors the strong. You’re assuming equal bargaining power between all actors. Reality is inherently unequal. This can lead to exploitation, monopoly and oligopoly. This is bad for the vast majority of individuals.

    To combat this individuals must organize to adjust for inequalities. This is the essence of government’s role in economic activity.

    • Clayton Gee May 10, 2011 at 10:34 pm #

      Monopoly is only possible through the state. You seem to suggest that an individual has an inherent amount of power over another. This is certainly not the case, we as humans are only able to achieve forceful aggression through the consent of others. Government is not the only type of organization of which individuals can deter those who wish to infringe upon their natural right.

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.